3DMARK06 Scores Here

I just tested my current setup and got a 4125. However, on the CPU test #2, something messed up. It acted like I had overclocked my graphics card to far, but everything was at stock speeds?

06.jpg

weird I reached 7k with x1900 series. How did you get 4k?
 
but honestly.. I would have excpected a bit more of the Geforce 8 series.. I mean, when I compare it to what i have, yea, its an improvement, but not that big tough (and then considering my cards are what, 2 years old now? :o )
nevertheless, its nice
 
but honestly.. I would have excpected a bit more of the Geforce 8 series.. I mean, when I compare it to what i have, yea, its an improvement, but not that big tough (and then considering my cards are what, 2 years old now? :o )
nevertheless, its nice

ehh... thats still comparing dual card to single card.
and it still beats it...
of course, its not even the gtx... its the lower gts though its still very powerful.
 
yea.. but the 7800 series is 2 generations older that the 8800 ;) ( the 7900/7950 came in between, and yes, i do consider them to be a own generation because of having a different arcitecture)

also, an slightly overclocked 7950GX2 could reach the same score as that iirc :)


edit:.. but yes... Strength in numbers ftw. ^_^
 
well, actually the 7800 and 7900 series are the same architecure (hence the same pixel pipeline and vertex shader count)... the difference is between clock rate because of the switch from 130nm (or was it 110nm?) to 90nm... letting nvidia raise core clock a bunch.

imagine 8800gtx quad SLI lol
can you say 25k in 3dmark06? insane. lol
then again, you never know with bottlenecks lol
 
yea... but going from 130nm (i think it was 130.. :o ) to 90nm makes quite a new chip imo.. call it the 7800MkII if you want ;)

but like I said, I did excpect a bit more.. meaning it's my oppinion, nobody has to (and appearantly does) agree with me on that :)

Its a nice score,.. but I would have expected 12k or so tbh :o
 
I was surprised with that score, because spec wise her dual 7800GTX's are better then my card.

But I did some more OC'in and got a bit over 10K :D
 
I really doubt spec wise the 7800GTX's are higher,... I really do ;)

edit: Maybe youre confused with the 7900GTX's? ( for example.. the 8800GTS already hase more VRAM than my 2 cards.. i have 512Mb combined, the 8800GTS has 640.. :o )
 
I really doubt spec wise the 7800GTX's are higher,... I really do ;)

edit: Maybe youre confused with the 7900GTX's? ( for example.. the 8800GTS already hase more VRAM than my 2 cards.. i have 512Mb combined, the 8800GTS has 640.. :o )

I PM'd you the link, but you'll have to enable dual-card config because I think it resets to just a single card by default.

Oh ya, and SLI doesnt add up the memory, so you still only have 256MB :)
 
7800GTX (256Mb SLI'd)
Framebuffer: 256,256 MB
Memory Type: GDDR3
Memory Bus Type: 64x4 (256 bit)
DirectX Compliance: 9.0c
OpenGL Compliance: 2.0
PS Version: 3.0
VS Version: 3.0
Process: 110 nm
Fragment Pipelines: 24
Vertex Pipelines: 8
Texture Units: 24
Raster Operators 16

Memory Bandwidth: 76.8 GB/sec
Shader Operations: 20640 Operations/sec
Pixel Fill Rate: 13760 MPixels/sec
Texture Fill Rate: 20640 MTexels/sec
Vertex Operations: 1720 MVertices/sec


8800GTS
Noise Level: ?
Framebuffer: 640 MB
Memory Type: GDDR3
Memory Bus Type: 64x5 (320 bit)
DirectX Compliance: 10.0
OpenGL Compliance: 2.0
PS Version: 4.0
VS Version: 4.0
Process: 90 nm
Fragment Pipelines: 96 (128)
Vertex Pipelines: 96 (128)
Texture Units: 24 (32)
Raster Operators 20 (24)

Memory Bandwidth: 64 GB/sec
Shader Operations: 48000 Operations/sec
Pixel Fill Rate: 10000 MPixels/sec
Texture Fill Rate: 12000 MTexels/sec
Vertex Operations: 12000 MVertices/sec



hmm... you want to run me through that again? ;) because the only thing the SLI cards have higher is the Pixel Fill Rate and the Texture Fill Rate.. wich both are only noticable on really high resolutions.. the shaders ad vertex opperations are the ones that really matter a lot.
 
Back
Top