Intel_man
VIP Member
Unless you rewire your whole house to be 10Gb capable, I don't think you can brag about anything.Sure, I could reterminate everything and brag my ass off here I guess.
Unless you rewire your whole house to be 10Gb capable, I don't think you can brag about anything.Sure, I could reterminate everything and brag my ass off here I guess.
Unless you rewire your whole house to be 10Gb capable, I don't think you can brag about anything.
That sounds more like a user problem than a tool problem.Bad enough I had to reterminate one ethernaet cable a few times because it wasn't working right.
Gigabit over UTP was standardized almost 20 years ago, you might as well brag about a Pentium 3 while you're at it.I could reterminate everything and brag my ass off here I guess
Not unless the user is a tool.That sounds more like a user problem than a tool problem.
what are you even on about?I can use vague terms as well...
I use my 100 MbPS to fly my F22 Raptor at Mach 2.35 at 1500 MPH ground speed with a Yellowstone One SID out of KDEN with a transition to HANKI on my way on J148 to KORD.
And I'll have you know my Pentium 3 that uses my 100 MbPS connection to Pornhub works wonders with the projector aimed at the ceiling. HAHA
what are you even on about?
The easiest fix in that scenario is to re-combine the single cable split and use a switch to forward frames from multiple hosts.
"Gigabit over UTP was standardized almost 20 years ago..."
WTH is UTP? And why would I care when most people don't have Gig speed. I'm not a networking engineer. I don't know what the hell UTP is. He talks like I know about networking protocols.
I know UTM. Universal Transverse Mercator.
What does that even mean? Forward frames? Yeah, I'm sure everyone knows how to forward frames.
So you ran your own UTP cabling and still don't know what UTP is. Classic.WTH is UTP?
Not everyone is as challenged as you are.I'm sure everyone knows how to forward frames.
I've been merging all your double posts lately.
I dunno. Don't see a option to connect to 5.0 band. Used to have Comcast which was godspeed but switched to AT&T because bills starting getting to high.Are you using the 2.4G band? That looks, bad.
You can attach your own router to get the dual band if theirs doesn't. What model router did they use?Also, they connected the WiFi to a router they brought, not my nice one I already have.
I'm not sure, it's unbranded, except for the AT&T logo. But I'll try that out.You can attach your own router to get the dual band if theirs doesn't. What model router did they use?
That's the preferred way yes. If the modem doesn't allow for bridging, he can pursue the IP Passthrough method if AT&T allows for a 2nd IP to be assigned to his address. Only downside with IP Passthrough is you'll run into NAT issues when trying to open specific ports. Running your router as an AP is the last option if you don't want to use the modem's wifi.If you attach a router to the modem you'll need ton use bridging mode in the modem which means you need to log into the modem.
I had to do this with my modem to use my router with it.
There's going to be a model on it somewhere and you should be able to track down some documentation. In my experience the AP's that AT&T provides are actually decent. I wish our 5GHz channel had better range but they but it in the basement for some stupid reason.I'm not sure, it's unbranded, except for the AT&T logo. But I'll try that out.
There's not much you can do with that. The 5GHz band isn't great at penetrating walls and there are limits the strength routers can transmit signals so most routers are roughly the same in its range. 2.4Ghz sucks on AC because it can't handle the bandwidth AC can provide.I wish our 5GHz channel had better range but they but it in the basement for some stupid reason.
1024-QAM can push 2.4ghz to 1000Mbps which is only achievable through AC routers because 1024-QAM only exists on AC routers.I didn't think AC had 2.4 GHz. I thought AC was 5 GHz only.