Post A Pic Of Your Pc Here :)
- Thread starter jancz3rt
- Start date
S.T.A.R.S.
banned
What do you think about that?
Maybe I have 15 years old computer,but I think my environment is better anyway (first 2 pictures simply show where we all are...including me lol):
Of course I will not show you the computer room from which I operate all that data and I will also not give you an address where I live lol.
Cheers!
CrazyHV8000
Active Member
True. AMD don't use PhysX as physics source. The AMD use different type of physics such as Bullet Physics. Also GTX 680+GTX 260 is not SLI. neither 7770+GTX 260 is a SLI, CrossFire or Bridge.
wolfeking
banned
You make things a lot more complicated than they need to be. AMD does not do physics period. AMD drivers offload physics on the processor, which is a less than optimal solution.
A GTX260 Physics on a GTX680 is crap anyway. It will be holding the 680 back. You need similar cards to get and serious advantage from Physics.
A GTX260 Physics on a GTX680 is crap anyway. It will be holding the 680 back. You need similar cards to get and serious advantage from Physics.
CrazyHV8000
Active Member
I don't say AMD own any physics. AMD don't own any physics ever when Nvida owned Physx physics system which is I got frustrated a bit. There is no physics activities on AMD video card unless the game have Bullet Physics or Havok. It did improve FPS rated by GTX 680 + GTX 260 but it not worth due to power hungry unless adam want to spend another pair for SLI.
Here is my AMD video card with Bullet Physics (scroll down)
http://xfxforce.com/en-us/Products/...-HD-7000/AMD-Radeon-HD-7770/FX-777A-ZDB4.aspx
CrazyHV8000
Active Member
True. If game don't have PhysX engine and have GTX 680 Graphics card+ GTX 260 PhysX card, it would be wasted money and energy. Plus it won't help boost up game-without-PhysX. That would hurt me, if getting GTX 680 + GTX 260 and i don't have game with PhysX. I'm fan of Plus 80 Gold and Energy Star.
If want physics on AMD, the game have to be Bullet Physics or Havok.
I don't believe it. You had to have PhysX set to the CPU instead of the 680 to get those results. What resolution are you gaming on anyway?
1920x1080, but remember i've got i5 on '56 socket and only 4,0 GHz
Yep, as dedicated PPU.
Virssagòn
VIP Member
Wanna see how strong it is compared to others.
test my benchmark
. http://www.computerforum.com/215772-black-hole-v3-benchmark.htmlLet me know what you got with a picture
Aastii
VIP Member
It is situational. If you have a dedicated Physx card that can keep up with your main graphics card and you use an application that utilises Physx, performance will be better than with Physx on the same card doing the graphics processing
Lol, it's like SLI but with different cards and less performance boost
Why doesn't amd have something like that !?
Because Physx is an Nvidia technology, but you can still use an AMD card. You would have the AMD card as your main graphics card and the Nvidia card as dedicated Physx. You need to use either outdated Nvidia drivers, as they got rid of the ability to use Nvidia and AMD together, or cracked drivers to get it to work.
This is the better use of a dedicated Physx card imho. If you have a powerful Nvidia card anyway, it will be able to handle all of the processing. If you have just AMD, it can handle the game but you will not, no matter how powerful the card, be able to use Physx. By having that Nvidia card there, you are essentially using it to enable the feature, rather than just offload some of the work load.
Yeah OK? Thats certainly no bottleneck. There really isn't much different in gaming between Lynnfield and Sandy bridge. I went from an I5 750 at 4.2ghz to a 2500k at 4.6ghz and the only difference I saw was lower temps.
At 1080p, a 680 should dominate any game at any setting, even metro 2033, without the need to a descreet physX card. Still willing to bet that when you had just the 680 in you had PhysX set to CPU and not to the 680.
CrazyHV8000
Active Member
With Geforce, PhysX can be used on CPU but it would slow down as my experience with 9600 GT.
Calin
Well-Known Member
Lol that's funny as hell.Maybe I have 15 years old computer,but I think my environment is better anyway (first 2 pictures simply show where we all are...including me lol):
Of course I will not show you the computer room from which I operate all that data and I will also not give you an address where I live lol.
Cheers!
wolfeking
banned
okay, back on topic, and kind of a mid phase thing. But pics of my computer currently.
Currently drilled out all of the rivets, and sprayed it down with aircraft grade paint stripper. Getting it to the bare metal, then going to put it back together with a look I can like for a while.
Currently drilled out all of the rivets, and sprayed it down with aircraft grade paint stripper. Getting it to the bare metal, then going to put it back together with a look I can like for a while.