|Official| Smiles Benchmark 2.0 Ranking Thread! (new version :P)

SmileMan said:
I'm really thinking you guys all have expensive crappy boards...
Because I can hit the 5ghz in a piece of cake. (eum, not sure, ran prime for 15-20 minutes but decided to clock back because of stock cooler :P)

edit: vista, come back skype. Wanna release the bitch
Click to expand...

Well... not really but my motherboard is like 130 dollar.
 
Its not even a expensive crappy board. Its a $120 crappy board. its horrid, and there is no shortage of instances of me saying so on here either. When I go to Gigabyte I will guarantee 5+GHz on air and 5.3 on water.
 
wolfeking said:
Its not even a expensive crappy board. Its a $120 crappy board. its horrid, and there is no shortage of instances of me saying so on here either. When I go to Gigabyte I will guarantee 5+GHz on air and 5.3 on water.
Click to expand...

I'm trying to understand. Do you mean your $120 motherboard?
 
wolfeking said:
Its not even a expensive crappy board. Its a $120 crappy board. its horrid, and there is no shortage of instances of me saying so on here either. When I go to Gigabyte I will guarantee 5+GHz on air and 5.3 on water.
Click to expand...

haha, yeah. I want a gigabit board too :'(. Gonna buy an h60 or 80 and OC to 4.9ghz I think.
 
yes. My Extreme 4 that will boot sometimes, and sometimes not. That will hold a volt either .2 below or above but never on what you set it to. And that is too complicated to really use.
 
wolfeking said:
Technically the 80386 intel would be the slowest. I think that is beyond even the existence of AMD.
Click to expand...

AMD was started in 1969 The AMD equivalent was the Am386.

wolfeking said:
1. If you are going to argue that they are bad, please link a source that says some issues with them.
Click to expand...

Are you joking? You want Links/Source about issues with ME and Vista? You would have to be born in a remote cave in Siberia, only let out at night with a blindfold and ear plugs to not know about issues with ME and Vista.


wolfeking said:
2. BULLSHIT! Vista is a perfectly functional operating system. If you all have issues with it, then do not use it. But with proper knowledge, it works perfectly fine. Taking a system as bad based on word of mouth is like saying "Guns kill people" or "all americans are retards" or "all french is gay". The opinion is nothing without the daily knowledge of it.
Click to expand...

Me was garbage. It was a over bloated remnants of 98, well really 95, was a driver crashing nightmare . Should have never been released. Was a desperate move as a stop gap because XP wasnt ready yet. Was the brilliant rushed idea of stupidity with no reason at all, even company executives thought it would be a better idea to release 2000 for the desktop. 98SE was the last good Windows FAT32 OS.

Vista at the start was suppost to be a Service Pack for XP. Since the good old boys at microshaft could not get together what was suppost to be the next OS (new file system beyond NTFS). Same as above (brilliant rushed idea of stupidity with no reason at all, even company executives thought it would be a better idea) to go with the Service Pack. Instead they make a whole OS out of the Service Pack, hence you have Vista. Rushed out the door because of delays, it was a memory/driver nightmare. Just like above! They finally fix it and change the name to 7, then make you pay for it, we fall for it.

ME was the lacking of the two. But sure you can work on both OS and make them a useable OS, Vista more so then ME.

Say you buy a (new) car. On the way home, the trunk pops open and wont stay shut. The windows stop rolling down. Then the air bag hits you in the face when the front left tire falls off.
What are you going to do?
1. Take it back and say its junk.
2. Take it on home and fix it yourself and call it a good car.

Sure you can fix it on your own, but to make that decision instead of returning it does not make that a good car!
 
Something is wrong with this bench. Mine takes 43 secs, new install the whole thing.

It hangs for about 30 secs then spits out 43secs. Any clues?
 
bigfellla said:
Didn't AMD just licence Intel's 386?
Click to expand...

Yeah, but they were Intel clones under IBMs two sources. That ended in court, with Intel losing and granting AMD the X86 code licence to build there own design. The first clean room based off the X86 licence was the K5. The same as Intel has a licence from AMD for AMD64, Intel calls it IA-32e or EM64T or Intel 64. As processors are now, AMD uses Intels X86 and Intel uses AMD64. Neither will really come to blows. If either ever breach there contract AMD could not make X86 and Intel could not make X86-64. Well it varys by who breached what.
 
*Release* Snapshot 2.2!!!

K guys, here is a snapshot release from the next version 2.2!
Not all the problems are fixed, but thats why we release only a snapshot.

The benchmark will now have 1 Test in case of 2, the passes are built in different ways and different quantities of threads.

Cpu Breaker: 16threaded with 1 very heavy calculation
8-threaded: 8threaded with much easy calculations
4-threaded: 4threaded with 4 big calculations
Xtreme Pass: 32threaded with 1 heavy and 3 other easy calculations (PC crashed when I did 46threaded, so I don't know that it works on dual core cpu's or 1core :P)

The times are measured in seconds.
Your points are Visible in the right corner under in the app. (higher the better)
Under the 4 passes an average from the 4 is shown.

The benchmark last longer and is a bit more stable. The 4threaded is not yet fully fixed, but that doesn't matter much in the points.

You can download the app here:
http://www.2shared.com/file/L07kppJZ/Smiles_App.html

Preview (me):

46097845.png


The scores will be an appart subject in the scoreboard.



SmileMan & Vistakid10
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top