|Official| Smiles Benchmark 2.0 Ranking Thread! (new version :P)

BULL. I personally have never had an issue that a simple update of C++ or directx could not fix. I use it daily, and it has ran far better than windows 7 has on my machines.
 
Jamebonds1 said:
Laquer Head is right. Some windows version can be worst, like Windows Vista and ME.

Check it out history. http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/history
Click to expand...
1. If you are going to argue that they are bad, please link a source that says some issues with them.
2. BULLSHIT! Vista is a perfectly functional operating system. If you all have issues with it, then do not use it. But with proper knowledge, it works perfectly fine. Taking a system as bad based on word of mouth is like saying "Guns kill people" or "all americans are retards" or "all french is gay". The opinion is nothing without the daily knowledge of it.
 
wolfeking said:
1. If you are going to argue that they are bad, please link a source that says some issues with them.
2. BULLSHIT! Vista is a perfectly functional operating system. If you all have issues with it, then do not use it. But with proper knowledge, it works perfectly fine. Taking a system as bad based on word of mouth is like saying "Guns kill people" or "all americans are retards" or "all french is gay". The opinion is nothing without the daily knowledge of it.
Click to expand...

Calm down. Vista might work well for you but not for me. I sometime frustrated with Vista long ago.
 
What issues did you have with it? I got it when it first came out, and it has never let me down. I stuck with 2k and XP over it. but it was and is by no means bad.
 
Gonna end this now. Vista is fine, it's not as good as 7 in my opinion, but still perfectly usable. There's nothing wrong with it. Vista never had a good start, thanks to lazy people not coding drivers correctly for Vista, hence why all the crashes. Most things have been fixed now and it is a perfectly usable OS.
 
wolfeking said:
What issues did you have with it? I got it when it first came out, and it has never let me down. I stuck with 2k and XP over it. but it was and is by no means bad.
Click to expand...

Since I'm home repair computer. I remove virus and fix startup stuff. Sometime it is pretty slowest and sometime crash. Also sometime it doing that i don't want it such as startup program.
 
I want to test this new build thoroughly before we release it into the wild.

Going to start work on the new leaderboard now.
 
when you test the 4 thread, use a load meter on your pops 3770 to be sure that it will run accurately on a HT processor. The current one does not and it throws the scores off.
 
K6? Hmmm, I still have one of those.

AMDK-6.jpg


Later I should drag out one of my working old comps and take the record for longest in the test.
 
K, we're gonna make 1 bench! 4 passes with different threading :P
And then an average score so it's easyer for the boards. :P
The Xtreme pass is 46-threaded :O
 
Current Scores!

*Times are in seconds. Lower is better!

*All CPU clockspeeds are stock unless otherwise stated.

Top 15 Heavy 4-Threaded:

1. Laquer Head - i7 3770K 5.0 - 16G RipJaws-X 1866 - 89.2945568
2. wolfeking - i7 2600K 4.5 - 8G DDR3 - 93.8184
3. tech savvy - i5 2550K 4.2 - 8G Vengeance - 98.4546284
4. vistakid10 - i5 2500K 4.3 - 16G RipJaws-X 1648 - 98.4861003
5. salvage-this - i7 930 4.0 - 12G Dominator 1600 - 106.1212076
6. KasperL - i7 3930K - 16G DDR3 - 109.4273062
7. SmileMan - i7 2600K - 16G Hyper-X 1600 - 111.4573749
8. wolfeking - i7 2600K - 8G DDR3 - 118.0815084
9. Jamebonds1 - i3 540 4.6 - 4G Patriot 1230 - 119.7926104
10. jimkonow - i7 3770S - 16G RipJaws-X - 120.9002124
11. Linkin - i5 2500K - 8G RipJaws-X 1600 - 122.7400203
12. Laquer Head - i7 3610QM - 16G Vengeance 1866 - 129.368
13. jonnyp11 - X4 960T 3.8 (Unlocked to X6) - 8G Kingston 1333 - 151.3961111
14. Hyper-Threaded - X4 855 - 4G RipJaws-X 1333 - 154.7522698
15. FuryRosewood - X4 955 - 16G Crucial 1333 - 156.2702156


Top 15 Light 8-Threaded:

1. wolfeking - i7 2600K 4.8 - 8G DDR3 - 14.9604
2. Laquer Head - i7 3770K 5.0 - 16G RipJaws-X 1866 - 16.7232294
3. jimkonow - i7 3770S - 16G RipJaws-X - 18.153434
4. salvage-this - i7 930 4.0 - 12G Dominator 1600 - 18.1645896
5. SmileMan - i7 2600K - 16G Hyper-X 1600 - 18.8240766
6. wolfeking - i7 2600K - 8G DDR3 - 20.3892358
7. Laquer Head - i7 3610QM - 16G Vengeance 1866 - 20.5764361
8. Jamebonds1 - i3 540 4.72 - 4G Patriot 1230 - 20.6700364
9. Claptonman - FX-6100 4.3 - 8G RipJaws-X 1600 - 21.4390775
10. vistakid10 - i5 2500K 4.3 - 16G RipJaws-X 1648 - 27.6008391
11. Hyper-Threaded - X4 855 - 4G RipJaws-X 1333 - 30.1080525
12. tech savvy - i5 2550K 4.2 - 8G Vengeance - 33.9348349
13. FuryRosewood - X4 955 - 16G Crucial 1333 - 34.6200479
14. johnb35 - X4 965 - 8G Vengeance 1600 - 34.8505607
15. vistakid10 - Q8300 - 4G DDR2 667 - 48.701


Remember if your CPU and/or RAM is overclocked to say so in your post or write it in your signature!

If any information here is incorrect, please let me know ASP and I will correct it.

When we get more AMD submissions, I'll break the categories down into Intel and AMD. Right now there are not enough AMD entries really to warrant doing this.
 
Last edited:
wolfeking said:
when you test the 4 thread, use a load meter on your pops 3770 to be sure that it will run accurately on a HT processor. The current one does not and it throws the scores off.
Click to expand...

Will get Smile to test with a load meter on his 2600K and I'll proof test it on Dad's 3770. :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top