xbox 360 ati 512mb vs 7800gtx 512 mb

yes
Because xbox 360 running ati version of 512 mb videocard. When playing king kong you can see how the graphic's lagg's in the middle of game. Thats because ati's make crappy video cards. Remember the 9800 Pro check out how the 9800 pro loses agaisnt the low class fx 5900 in benchmark. http://www.gen-x-pc.com/geforcefx5900_review.htm
Click to expand...

Although I did not click your link (and prob. wont) I disagree. I would recommend the 9800Pro over any of the FX's. I also think that both ATi and Nvidia make a fine product and to argue over it is gay.
 
Blue said:
Although I did not click your link (and prob. wont) I disagree. I would recommend the 9800Pro over any of the FX's. I also think that both ATi and Nvidia make a fine product and to argue over it is gay.
Click to expand...

I agree.

Quicky I want to ask,do any other companies make graphics cards except, Nvidia and ATI or they the only2 ?? (im talking cards for home use).
 
Also you need to compare the teraflops. I mean Sony have claimed they can get 1.8terraflops where as the Xbox 360 can only get about 1 terraflop if I remember correctly.

The only way you can compare the systems is with a bench marking programme. Unfortunately there is not one designed for consoles (as far as im awear). And te PS3 is notreleased yet. So let the comparisons start when someone actualy owns one.

Besides Getting the PS3 isformore than the games, itsa blueray player and much more. Can have 7 controlers other than the usual 4.
 
Jon Boy said:
Quicky I want to ask,do any other companies make graphics cards except, Nvidia and ATI or they the only2 ?? (im talking cards for home use).
Click to expand...

Yes, there are others besides ATi and nVidia (jut like there are others besides AMD and Intel) you just don't hear about them often.

I believe Trident is an older brand...(rumages through old gfx cards) hmm well looks like that's the only card I had, an't even find it now. Some older guys on here can remember some I'm sure.

I'll skip the XBOX360 vs. PC debate for now...
 
Theres another video card company called Volari, however games arent designed around them so there not the best performers.
 
geoff5093 said:
Theres another video card company called Volari, however games arent designed around them so there not the best performers.
Click to expand...


Asus and BFG Are the best OVERCLOCKERS with videocards.

xbox360 i see it everyday at compusa hate to say it but the graphic's is GAY

Drools the power of 7800gtx
 
OK people, sorry if I missed part of this but I didn't read it all :P

Here's something to consider. At least with older systems, they ran at much lower resolutions than your typical computer game. Your basic TV is limited to around 720x480. The only reason games looked so good is because TVs are interlaced, that can really smooth things out.

But take running at a low res with a game made specifical for the hardware and add in(or take away) nothing else to cause it to lag running in the background... That's why consoles typically have better looking games.

Games for todays PC's have to work with about any hardware. Of course they can't make something completely limited to an Athlon64 x2 4200 with 2G RAM and a 7800GTX SLi. Who here could run that?
 
But take running at a low res with a game made specifical for the hardware and add in(or take away) nothing else to cause it to lag running in the background... That's why consoles typically have better looking games.

Games for todays PC's have to work with about any hardware. Of course they can't make something completely limited to an Athlon64 x2 4200 with 2G RAM and a 7800GTX SLi. Who here could run that?
Click to expand...

Can I get a "Hello ya!" Agreed totally.
 
i'm sure some people start these threads to create arguements lol.
I would say that the only reason that the xbox graphics dont look as good as graphics on a pc is because of the lower resolution.
however, i feel that the xbox is still a bit slower than a lot of high end pc's but it doesn't matter as it doesn't have the burden of a fat operating system on its back.
but one question that needs to be asked is whats the point of comparing an xbox to a pc?
 
I wont bother buying either Xbox 360 or PS3 there a waste of money trying to keep up that doesnt include pc's thats different aways im having funny torchering my xbox crystral. Hairy lee is right this thread must have been started to an arguement!
 
Archangel said:
im sorry,... but Duh,.. ofcourse that system runs games better than the xbox.. faster processor, 8 timse the ram, sli'd grafics.
but,.. you forgot to mention that it also costs more than 180% of the price a xbox 360 does,.. so.. if you look at it that way, the xbox360 is the better bang for the buck.
Click to expand...

Even when you buy xbox360 you still going to have to buy the games. And each game cost more then pc games if i were u i would just upgrade the system that can stay for 1 yr fresh. And just start buying the games.

And remember its not about the cheapest buck all the time. For true gamers its about the sound quilty, resolution and graphics. Xbox360 doesnt support non of these. If you want benefits out of games, go for pc games because its stress free you can go online and chat at the same time check emails etc. and play all your games. Also remember the original xbox was 98% pc. The worst about the original xbox was that it had low specs like low ram, low class videocard low hardrive space and more. Xbox360 is nothing but a pc too its just remodel a little bit so people can aviod upgrading it like they did to the orginal xbox. And so people can stop making that emulator and iso files.
If you really want to spend the money for console and can't afford a 5000.00 dollar pc like mines. Just wait for ps3 and Which has better graphics then 360 has Not that ps3 has better graphic quilty then BFG-TECH 7800gtx OC 512 mb that's displayed on newegg or any 7800gtx. But it sure beat 360.
 
Last edited:
maroon1 said:
ps3 gpu is made by nvidia and it is much more powerful than xbox360 gpu and 512MB 7800GTX
Click to expand...

Doesnt know what he talking about. I know people that works for sony and even said ps3 will not have better graphics then BFG-Tech 7800gtx OC 512MB

Take a look what your up against

Showimage.asp


Showimage.asp


How how huge that heatsink and fan and videocard is fool

Core clock 580MHz
PixelPipelines 24
Memory Clock 1750MHz
Memory Size 512MB
Memory Interface 256-bit
Memory Type GDDR3
Intellisample 4.0 Technology
CineFX 4.0 Engine
UltraShadow II Technology
NVIDIA ForceWare

System Requirements-A minimum 400W system power supply (with 12V current rating of 26A or more)

You cant beat that. No WAY ps3 will have a better graphic then this MONSTER.
 
Last edited:
Pr0 said:
Core clock 580MHz
PixelPipelines 24
Memory Clock 1750MHz
Memory Size 512MB
Memory Interface 256-bit
Memory Type GDDR3
Intellisample 4.0 Technology
CineFX 4.0 Engine
UltraShadow II Technology
NVIDIA ForceWare

System Requirements-A minimum 400W system power supply (with 12V current rating of 26A or more)

You cant beat that. No WAY ps3 will have a better graphic then this MONSTER.
Click to expand...

Xbox 360's GPU

Core clock: 700MHz - which is faster than the card you posted.
Memory interface: 256 bit
Pixel Pipelins: 48 - DAAAAAAAMN
Memory type: 512MB GDDR3

Does the Xbox 360's card still look like a piece of crap?
 
Ya know with all this bickering I'm reminded of when Sony's hardware (Sony playstation) was blowing away other more powerful consoles in the graphics department. This was because the system was a great platform for the developers to work with. In the end it did not matter what system had the most power. It had more to do with what system was easiest to develop for. It will be interesting what the future holds. Either way it is still gay to argue over what system is best ;).
 
Blue said:
Ya know with all this bickering I'm reminded of when Sony's hardware (Sony playstation) was blowing away other more powerful consoles in the graphics department. This was because the system was a great platform for the developers to work with. In the end it did not matter what system had the most power. It had more to do with what system was easiest to develop for. It will be interesting what the future holds. Either way it is still gay to argue over what system is best ;).
Click to expand...

especially when there is no direct comparison between the systems
 
FIRST
just wait for ps3 and Which has better graphics then 360 has Not that ps3 has better graphic quilty then BFG-TECH 7800gtx OC 512 mb that's displayed on newegg or any 7800gtx. But it sure beat 360.
Click to expand...
Sony has said they are using G71 RSX GPU and with a 7 CORED cpu and 2x 256 GDDR3 at its disposal it WILL kick ass !.(most up to date pcs only have DDR2 memory and 2 cores).

Ive got an x360 and ITS kept VERY cool !!!!!! and i also have king kong and a 1080 HDTV !. Its a great game and NO LAG AT ALL ! the X360 has 3x 80mm FANS and 2x120mm fans on the psu. It makes all the difference.(try it if you own 1 !).

X360 will soon be WATERCOOLED :) (wish me luck !).

X360 is a fine games console unit and does its job GR8! over my pc. (specs below).

Can`t w8 for PS3 !, IT WILL GIVE A UP TO DATE PC A RUN FOR ITS MONEY :) (GAMES WISE)

EDIT: Remeber that the x360 512mb is shared memory cpu/gpu !
 
Last edited:
PS3 will blow 360 graphics out of the water!!!
Click to expand...
yes ur correct and
But by the time it comes out, PC graphics will have caught up.
Click to expand...
i wouldnt count on it !. the JAPS are very advanced now and with the combining companies of IBM, SONY and TOSHIBA they will make soming very special !.
 
by the time it comes out pc graphics will have gone well past the stage of beating it, the ps3 hardware specs wont be changing before it comes out but there will be plenty of graphics upgrades in the meantime.
so before you see anything dont go making stupid statements like that because it just leads to arguments which is just a waste of everybody's time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top