I agree. Brings back the good ole FF gameplay which I like a lot better then the new FF games (although the new ones are good too)I'll stick with my 360 that has been running flawlessly since launch. But anyways, the DS has got me playing Final Fantasy 3..Such a good game, recommend it to all DS owners.
My buddy just "read" that 360 is graphically better then PS3? He says he forgot where he read it but this is what he said...
"I can't remember why but I know it has to do with the framerate and stress on the processor"
Is that even close to true? I read that PS3 has AF AA while 360 doesn't... PS3 has three high powered processors and runs 1080p @ 60fps when 360 does it at 30fps. Any help here?
dot dot dot...
You've got your 'facts' seriously messed up. As far as I know, the PS3 has one 8-core CPU while the 360 has a 3-core CPU. And the 360 does have AA, not sure about the AF since I haven't payed attention to that detail but I'm pretty sure it does. Now, about the 60 fps while running games at 1080p...The problem here is that the PS3 and 360 only have a handful of games that actually run at that resolution. I think I saw only one PS3 game that actually supported that resolution. Not sure about 360 games since 1080p was just recently added. Anyways, in the end it comes down to the developers to actually utilize each system's power in the right way. NamcoBandai apparently did a bad job when they made Gundam Crossfire. The game looks like crap and plays like it too.
Gamespot.com said:We found that the Xbox 360 actually had better graphics in the majority of the games we compared.
Read the conclusion :http://www.gamespot.com/features/6162742/p-8.html
I have read it, ok. The PS3 has potential. Big deal.
You know those 400,000 consoles Sony supposedely sold out the first 2 weeks. Think again.
Sony sells less than 200,000 PS3 units in November
I have read it, ok. The PS3 has potential. Big deal.
You know those 400,000 consoles Sony supposedely sold out the first 2 weeks. Think again.
Its okay dont be jealous.