fastdude
Active Member
Well, with technology the way it is, the best bang for your buck probably changes almost on a weekly basis.
So, you would have to maintain a list of hardware that would change weekly, plus what about specials and things on sale?
I think maybe a framework of how to qualify the best bang for your buck would be better, and it would apply to any future hardware releases. Things like qualifying the user. Like what they need, what they expect performance wise. Then budget, and look at overall cost of ownership.
Take into account warranties, support, customer service, etc. Then paint a picture of overall cost of ownership.
That would apply to any new hardware releases and sales. Otherwise, if you feel like maintaining and updating a bi-weekly article on the current best deal, go for it.
Though I realise it would be hard, what I'd really like to do is a sort of monthly-updated guide of the best components for certain budgets ($500 PC, $750 PC, etc.) I feel I could keep track of the new hardware releases each month, but I wouldn't be sure whether that would be too much like reinventing the wheel, as I think a few other computer sites have a hardware guide (bit-tech I know definitely does), but those guides, while comprehensive, don't really offer options in between the various budgets. They tend to leap from 400 to 1000 to 2000 to 5000, or something like that.
I could say what you would realistically be doing with a certain-budget PC: just web-browsing, light gaming, hi-res multiple monitor gaming, whatever.