It certainly can't be used as you're primary currency. But its possible to use it more than a lot of people think
The issue with Bitcoin is that the more users and the more time goes on the algorithm gets more and more complex and the difficulty rises exponentially. There is no money to be made any more in bitcoins, look at another cryptocurrency.
There has to be a limit of supply, otherwise there is no value on demand. Basic economics. The algorithm of bitcoins means that Bitcoins are created at a decreasing and predictable rate. The number of new bitcoins created each year is automatically halved over time until bitcoin issuance halts completely with a total of 21 million bitcoins in existence.
Which link? The only one I saw mentioning ANY successful hacking attempt was the wikipedia article, which finishes with "This was the only major security flaw found and exploited in Bitcoin's history." It was a flaw and it was corrected. And if you look at the actual vulnerability summary, you'll find that it was a programming flaw; the problem was not the mathematics or theory behind bitcoin.And I have already posted a link pointing out the many flaws in this system that allow people to hack the system and get whatever they want out of it. In that link I posted, it said someone was able to get 18 BILLION bitcoins from one "block". Explain to me how they are limited.
What do you mean by a "vague definition"? It's very well defined, you can read the source of any bitcoin client/miner, you could read the actual protocol specification, Getwork protocol, or you could read the paper I linked to before.Its hard not to be skeptical of something that has such a vague definition of what its actually doing.
Which link? The only one I saw mentioning ANY successful hacking attempt was the wikipedia article, which finishes with "This was the only major security flaw found and exploited in Bitcoin's history." It was a flaw and it was corrected. And if you look at the actual vulnerability summary, you'll find that it was a programming flaw; the problem was not the mathematics or theory behind bitcoin.
They are limited because blocks are hashed, and acceptable hashes follow a certain format (they need to have a set number of leading zeroes, and the number increases with time, thus increasing difficulty.) Since the hashes have fixed length, there's obviously a limit to the number of distinct, valid hashes that can exist.
What do you mean by a "vague definition"? It's very well defined, you can read the source of any bitcoin client/miner, you could read the actual protocol specification, Getwork protocol, or you could read the paper I linked to before.
...know what for sure?I guess only the good people of 2140 will know for sure. Or the next person who hacks it. Or in the next 3 years.
...know what for sure?
Its not a computer program. Its MUCH different then that.
You're 24 so chances are "you're day" wasn't long ago, but that's beside the point.
And for the way Bitcoin works, its not based on any client. You're wallet is. Its impossible to manipulate Bitcoin itself.
And slightly off topic, but another step forward for BTC: http://www.tigerdirect.com/bitcoin/
Oh, of course. Whether they will be successful is another thing,When the bitcoin will stop, or if it even continues until it stops. Like I said, the governments would love to shut it down Im sure.
No, of course it does not. But it does require that majority of the network upgrades to a modified client; under the current protocol it is impossible, however, and I don't see why the cap would be lifted.And just because it currently has a "theoretical" limit does not mean that cannot be altered at some point in time. Its a computer program, computer programs are made to be modified.
Well, we don't know this yet.Well back on topic, we have established that there is no profit to be found in bitcoin mining and that its not an established currency in the usa (never will be)
Well, we don't know this yet.
Alright, I've concluded that there is little to no profit in bitcoin mining. Also, I don't have enough $ yet to buy the hardware, so by the time I save up enough, there will be even less profit than there is now. I don't really care if bitcoin can be used as a primary currency in the US because like I said, I am only interested in mining. My only other question is about other crypto-currencies. Would it be more profitable to mine litecoin, or something like that?
From what I am seeing, there is really only profit to be made at the start of these things. After that, its just a waste. Im still puzzled at HOW there is a profit from this. The world just doesnt make sense anymore.
Actually we do, because in america along with many other countries its highly illegal to produce and distribute your own currency. Like i said, the only reason bitcoin gets around it is because its not a physical currency. It will never be able to be used in a physical store in america legally unless the law changes to allow it and i doubt that.
There actually is potential for profit in bitcoin mining. Specialized mining IC's such as FPGA's and ASICs can generate enough BTC than how much they cost to operate on power, but as difficulty increases, they may never be able to pay for themselves. On the other hand, it's entirely possible that bitcoin could go up enough in value that even though it appears you're running at a loss right now, you potentially profit. It's not guaranteed by any means though. And a US Federal judge has ruled that BTC is a "Currency or form of money", so at least in the Eastern District of Texas, it's a form of Currency.Well back on topic, we have established that there is no profit to be found in bitcoin mining and that its not an established currency in the usa (never will be).
That is because you don't get it.
Where, exactly, do these laws exist within the United States Code? Disregarding "virtual" currencies, there's a number of private currencies in circulation within the United States. U.S. laws only prohibit counterfeiting of U.S. Currency AFAIK.
And bitcoin transactions are allowed in thousands of stores across the U.S, with a fair number of retailers accepting various other virtual currencies.
There actually is potential for profit in bitcoin mining. Specialized mining IC's such as FPGA's and ASICs can generate enough BTC than how much they cost to operate on power, but as difficulty increases, they may never be able to pay for themselves. On the other hand, it's entirely possible that bitcoin could go up enough in value that even though it appears you're running at a loss right now, you potentially profit. It's not guaranteed by any means though. And a US Federal judge has ruled that BTC is a "Currency or form of money", so at least in the Eastern District of Texas, it's a form of Currency.
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/...currency-can-be-regulated-under-american-law/
lolYour right. I will never understand why people value things that are not real.
No.Basically what I am getting from that article is that the founder of BitCoin was charged with running a ponzi scheme (which it really is)
lol
It is real. It just doesn't (generally) exist in physical form, and has little intrinsic value. But it is real, just as real as the pieces of paper and metal people buy stuff with.
No.