Okay. How is Apple supposed to advertise their product on their website? Some people need to understand marketing.
And yes, it is revolutionary in a way. Tablets were all but dead, and Apple revived that market completely. Look how many companies are coming out with tablets in response to the iPad.
And Microsoft didn't advertise Windows Vista and it's ridiculous number of versions as "revolutionary"? Every company in existence has and will advertise whatever product as something necessary and amazing. That's just common sense. It's then up to the consumer to say whether it is or not. You think it's not, some think it is. And as I said before it has revitalized the tablet industry. All of the large laptop manufacturers are now releasing their counter to the iPad. Which is a good thing as it sparks competition, which in turn will spark innovation. And we all know that the tablet sector was all but dead before the iPad.You're missing the whole point... Apple is promoting the ipad as "magical and revolutionary" when in fact it's just a larger itouch with a few more bells and whistles. It's an upgrade like any other electronic product in the world. It's all in the marketing/wording of the product.
No... Longhorn was advertised as revolutionary.And Microsoft didn't advertise Windows Vista and it's ridiculous number of versions as "revolutionary"?
doesn't look like much explaining is going on... It's just "wow! It uses much more resources than xp... But i'll buy it because it has dx10."
all we're showing now is that microsoft's marketing team are complete idiots compared to the apple marketing team.
This one's just for the lulz.
i mean are they working for microsoft or world of warcraft?
Okay. How is Apple supposed to advertise their product on their website? Some people need to understand marketing.
And yes, it is revolutionary in a way. Tablets were all but dead, and Apple revived that market completely. Look how many companies are coming out with tablets in response to the iPad.
Rofl!speedyink said:
[YT]e8M6S8EKbnU[/YT]
Oh we all know you hate anything Apple does, and even when they make a superior product you refuse to see it as an equal to any competitor.
Let me compare your video here:
[YT]1ZS8HqOGTbA[/YT]
to this video here:
[YT]e8M6S8EKbnU[/YT]
So, what do we have here to compare? Public speech and marketing techniques, which don't really reflect real world application of the products they are advertising.
Here is Balmer on the iPhone:
[YT]BcUicfqelC8[/YT]
Microsoft has lost touch with it's user base. Almost all the new features of Windows Vista and Windows 7 don't benefit the end user. They don't add small, minute features that actually help overall end user experience. Instead they concentrate on emulating other's innovations as of late. The simple fact that I can have multiple desktops, scroll up and down in background and foreground windows with out switching the active window, completely hide apps from the finder, and use keyboard short cuts for just about everything means that Apple really does try to improve the end user experience.
Most people that form opinions don't understand how an OS even operates, let alone the one they are criticizing. All of the Apple haters here have no idea that under the hood Unix reads off of tons of XML files to execute input and desired configurations. The concept is actually quite genius when you get down into it, though I am willing to bet 99% of the people out there won't ever bother to learn. They just want to use it and want it to work.
So, the next time you want to bash anything that is non PC, just stop and ask yourself if you even understand the differences and how it works. I don't ever hear anyone bashing Sun and Solaris, though I would doubt anyone here would even know how to use those systems.
The iPad, is yet to be tried, tested, or proven in the market. All you can do is guess. You cannot state your opinion as fact. Yes, it is kind of expensive, but again, Apple uses IPS technology in all of their screens, which does have higher quality color contrast and is more costly. Go talk to a designer who makes their living off of designing materials for a living. They are going to tell you their $2,000 ultra wide IPS LCD Monitor was worth every penny, especially when it gets down into color blending. To me, it wouldn't matter, to most people it would not matter. However, to say that it is over priced is false. To say that you wish there were a cheaper option with a lower quality screen would be more accurate.
here is my favorite, the Balmer remix
Microsoft has lost touch with it's user base. Almost all the new features of Windows Vista and Windows 7 don't benefit the end user.
Huh... lost touch with the users? I happen to find the new features of 7 and even the ones that came new on vista have been extremely helpful. Just using the snap feature alone saves me a lot of time when I am doing my coding projects in Java! About being so much better for the user because you can use macros that run bits of your operating system, I use macros for about 20% of the work that I do on my computer. If i want to, I have navigated the majority of what I work on with macros alone. I just find it easier with a mouse.
Most people that form opinions don't understand how an OS even operates, let alone the one they are criticizing. All of the Apple haters here have no idea that under the hood Unix reads off of tons of XML files to execute input and desired configurations. The concept is actually quite genius when you get down into it, though I am willing to bet 99% of the people out there won't ever bother to learn. They just want to use it and want it to work.
So, the next time you want to bash anything that is non PC, just stop and ask yourself if you even understand the differences and how it works. I don't ever hear anyone bashing Sun and Solaris, though I would doubt anyone here would even know how to use those systems.
The iPad, is yet to be tried, tested, or proven in the market. All you can do is guess. You cannot state your opinion as fact. Yes, it is kind of expensive, but again, Apple uses IPS technology in all of their screens, which does have higher quality color contrast and is more costly. Go talk to a designer who makes their living off of designing materials for a living. They are going to tell you their $2,000 ultra wide IPS LCD Monitor was worth every penny, especially when it gets down into color blending. To me, it wouldn't matter, to most people it would not matter. However, to say that it is over priced is false. To say that you wish there were a cheaper option with a lower quality screen would be more accurate.
Their screens are nice. I would love to have one. But on the ipad, who is doing high performance designing? I don't know maybe there is an app for that so I can finger edit my photos.
you do have a point that it needs to be tried tested and proven and that you can't say opinions as fact. But when I saw the ad and looked up what the features were I saw no reason at all that it is so much better than anything that I have ever used before. especially since for the 64gb wi-fi model it comes out to $699. fyi, I built my desktop for under that.
"All the little things that matter"The simple fact that I can have multiple desktops, scroll up and down in background and foreground windows with out switching the active window, completely hide apps from the finder, and use keyboard short cuts for just about everything means that Apple really does try to improve the end user experience.
"All the little things that matter"
I still don't quite understand why the aren't putting all these almost obvious, simple features in. I mean, if a free OS or a "fashion product" can have it...