AMD® Athlon™ 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5600+
- Thread starter lynxthechosen0
- Start date
ThatGuy16
VIP Member
I can play this game too
http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.html?modelx=33&model1=922&model2=874&chart=426
http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.html?modelx=33&model1=922&model2=874&chart=416
http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.html?modelx=33&model1=922&model2=874&chart=424
http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.html?modelx=33&model1=922&model2=874&chart=432
http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.html?modelx=33&model1=922&model2=874&chart=427
http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.html?modelx=33&model1=877&model2=921&chart=427
http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.html?modelx=33&model1=877&model2=921&chart=437
http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.html?modelx=33&model1=877&model2=921&chart=433
The 5600+ is on par with E6550, 6000+ on par E6600...
You can't go by benchmarks, each cpu will perform in its own way in different tests. And benchmarks are not always accurate.
http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.html?modelx=33&model1=922&model2=874&chart=426
http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.html?modelx=33&model1=922&model2=874&chart=416
http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.html?modelx=33&model1=922&model2=874&chart=424
http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.html?modelx=33&model1=922&model2=874&chart=432
http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.html?modelx=33&model1=922&model2=874&chart=427
http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.html?modelx=33&model1=877&model2=921&chart=427
http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.html?modelx=33&model1=877&model2=921&chart=437
http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.html?modelx=33&model1=877&model2=921&chart=433
The 5600+ is on par with E6550, 6000+ on par E6600...
You can't go by benchmarks, each cpu will perform in its own way in different tests. And benchmarks are not always accurate.
maroon1
New Member
Tomshardware charts is not as much as reliable as anandtech
It looks to me that E6550 is better from anandtech review, but you are saying that 6000+ is better.
Ok let us say that E6550 is on par with 6000+. This will end the debate about which one is better
EDIT: Here is another review for you
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/core2duo-e6850_7.html#sect0
Both xbitlabs and anandtech are more reliable than Tomshardware charts. E6550 performs on par with 6000+ (if not better)
2 reliable reviews I posted vs 1 unreliable review you posted
I think what I'm saying is more accurate
It looks to me that E6550 is better from anandtech review, but you are saying that 6000+ is better.
Ok let us say that E6550 is on par with 6000+. This will end the debate about which one is better
EDIT: Here is another review for you
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/core2duo-e6850_7.html#sect0
Both xbitlabs and anandtech are more reliable than Tomshardware charts. E6550 performs on par with 6000+ (if not better)
2 reliable reviews I posted vs 1 unreliable review you posted
I think what I'm saying is more accurate
Last edited:
ThatGuy16
VIP Member
How is mine unreliable, what if i said tomshardware benchmarks are more reliable? you can't go by benchmarks, EVERY benchmark will have different results, so you can't say what are and what are not correct. You can't compare by a difference of 3fps, anything could cause a whopping difference in 3fps. I think at stock speeds the 5600/6000 would be on par with the e6550/6600 in most tasks. Why does it matter? Just about every thread that has someones asking about a amd cpu they get under rated..
This is getting pretty stupid, when you compare the stock 6400-6420-6550-6600 to the 5200-5400-5600-6000 its all so close it doesnt matter, sure Intel wins some but AMD wins some too. Theres not a big enough difference between them to argue about it!
Last edited:
