3DMARK06 Scores Here

Updated the rig so updating the score :D
15k%21%21%21---2.bmp


I tried it out with 1 card at 837/1197 and the processor only at 2.8Ghz and I pulled off a 11939, that was nice, 1 card was running 800 points higher than my old 5000+ BE with 2 cards!

Also the new cat 8.6's are very nice, they detect crossfire and if you remove a card just turns it off so you don't have to do a clean driver install each time. Also seems if something is running over monitor resolution it will make it run on your screen still. 1280x1024 and the whole thing showed up on my TV thats only 1360x768.

And look at that CPU score :O, can't wait for the new SB750, 3.5Ghz here I come, crack that 5,000 CPU score.
 
Last edited:
I do find 15.5k a bit low for 2 3870's in crossfire. I got jsut under 18k (at 1680x 1050,.. even with adaptive AA enabled. :x )
 
Archangel said:
I do find 15.5k a bit low for 2 3870's in crossfire. I got jsut under 18k (at 1680x 1050,.. even with adaptive AA enabled. :x )
Click to expand...

I'm only at 3.2Ghz, I bumped up the FSB a bit and got 50mhz more and ran the test and it netted me a 15,9xxx but it wasn't stable I couldn't even get a screen :p Once the new southbridge comes out and I can cross the barrier I'm at the scores should go up.

ThatGuy16 said:
Is mainly because of his phenom :(
Click to expand...

My 9850 got a better CPU scoring then your E8400, I also have the clock on the vidcards pretty low.
 
1Kurgan1 said:
I'm only at 3.2Ghz, I bumped up the FSB a bit and got 50mhz more and ran the test and it netted me a 15,9xxx but it wasn't stable I couldn't even get a screen :p Once the new southbridge comes out and I can cross the barrier I'm at the scores should go up.



My 9850 got a better CPU scoring then your E8400, I also have the clock on the vidcards pretty low.
Click to expand...

StrangleHold said:
How do you figure that. Didnt he get a higher CPU score than you. 4222 vs. 4567
Click to expand...

The thing with AMD processors, is that they do not work well with crossfire/sli. That CPU score means nothing, its the gaming performance.

Click the link in my sig, the CPU score is lower. But the SM 2.0 and SM 3.0 are extremely high. Its because of the processor architecture. AMD makes good processors, they just do not do handle multi card setups well.

15.4k is still pretty good though..
 
Last edited:
ThatGuy16 said:
The thing with AMD processors, is that they do not work well with crossfire/sli. That CPU score means nothing, its the gaming performance.

Click the link in my sig, the CPU score is lower. But the SM 2.0 and SM 3.0 are extremely high. Its because of the processor architecture. AMD makes good processors, they just do not do handle multi card setups well.

15.4k is still pretty good though..
Click to expand...

How exactly does the processor affect the performance of graphics cards (other than limiting)? I would think they are unrelated.
 
[-0MEGA-];986045 said:
Speaking of Vantage, I never could get it working on my PC. It gave an error every time I tried to run it after the first test.
Click to expand...

yeah same with me... it came up with some error every time.
ah well.


anyway in other news, i got just under 12000
which sorts sucks cos last time i tried i got 14000.

im not sure why it was so low. i had my gpu overclocked as far as it will go.
my cpu wasnt overclocked. ill try again tomorrow morning with it at 3.4 and see how it goes haha
 
wow i bet that 7600 is holding you back a few thousand points alone.

my score is consistently 11568, now that i've backed my cpu and gpu down a little bit.
 
9492-3dmarks
3DMark Score 9492 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score 4287
SM 3.0 Score 4462
CPU Score 2172
Core clock 650.0
Memory clock 925.0
Processor AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+
Processor clock 2854 MHz
for system in signature
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top