3DMARK06 Scores Here
- Thread starter spacedude89
- Start date
ExtremeAlien
New Member
gtx does say it has 900 mhz clock which is supposed to be 1800 but I don't know.
MosIncredible
New Member
Q6600 at stock bottlenecks the card? My friend has a Q6600 @ stock with 2 8800GTs at stock and gets a sloppy score as well. Like 3k lower than me.
Geoff
VIP Member
Are you referring to the memory speed? The core clock is not 1800MHz, but if you are referring to the memory speed then it may be showing you the speed before calculating the effective speed (DDR).
ExtremeAlien
New Member
Oh yeah I was talking about memory speed. Oh and thanks you solved my crisis about why it was showing 900mhz.
WeatherMan
Active Member
Gonna upgrade to 1.0.2 & oc both gpu & cpu later see if i can squeeze some more out, these are from 174.53
I wish I still had my Quad
Was running at 3G, what would my score be approx if i still had it ?
ThatGuy16
VIP Member
I thought for sure you'd hit 20K.
Ohh well.. maybe whenever i get new ram
Look at those SM scores though!
royalmarine
New Member
vista was killing my score.
so went dual boot with xp sp2.
8800gt sli @ stock
qx6700 @ 3.2ghz
striker 680i so my sli works nciely.
first attempt at rivatuner i was getting artifacts @ 720/2000 so ill drop it back to 700/1950 next time.
temps on the qx6700 were 41oC on load during 3dmark06 run.
idle around 30oC.
gfx temps idle @ 38 - 40oC so plenty of room to bring them up.
when they were on 720/2000 with ati artifact test they hit 52oC.
looks promising!
so went dual boot with xp sp2.
8800gt sli @ stock
qx6700 @ 3.2ghz
striker 680i so my sli works nciely.
first attempt at rivatuner i was getting artifacts @ 720/2000 so ill drop it back to 700/1950 next time.
temps on the qx6700 were 41oC on load during 3dmark06 run.
idle around 30oC.
gfx temps idle @ 38 - 40oC so plenty of room to bring them up.
when they were on 720/2000 with ati artifact test they hit 52oC.
looks promising!
royalmarine
New Member
I'm only getting around 11k with my setup. Is that normal for a rig like mine or should I be performing better? I would think that I should perform better with this setup? When I play crysis it really kick ass at high details. If this isn't a normal score for my setup I will like to know what might be wrong?
- Jacob
- Jacob
that does seem low,I get around 11K and you have a faster processor and 1gb more ram
Yeah, that is also what concerns me. Im running xp 64-bit. Maybe BIOS is not up to date?
well i know for a fact my bios isnt up to date either but i wont risk updating mine because ive never updated a bios before and i heard if you screw it up your mobo needs replacing or something
but you should have alot more points i should say
I would think so too . It performs very well in crysis and other games, and that is what matters. But I'm just wondering if it would be performing even better if I found out how I could make my score higher.