3DMARK06 Scores Here

Ku-sama said:
i hit somewhere around 3500 with my C2D setup
Click to expand...

I can beat that score easly with a better cooler.. At I need is 3.8ghz OC But I dont want to stress the life of my processor. Then Again I can always buy another one if something happens to this one.
 
Last edited:
DKdeadly said:
he doesint have the highest cpu score in this forum because pro has 3000 and i could get it too if i want to.
Click to expand...

Pro has better psu and better case with a better HSF and he said he gets very low volts at stock speed. That doesnt mean you will score the same thing. I can also get 3000+ score on my cpu if want to. The fact of matter is you cant even reach there.
 
well if yours at 3.8GHz can do 3500~, then my old X6800 at 4.3GHz prolly did somewhere in the high 3900, low 4000....
 
Ku-sama said:
well if yours at 3.8GHz can do 3500~, then my old X6800 at 4.3GHz prolly did somewhere in the high 3900, low 4000....
Click to expand...

What are you talking about? You dont have that system in your sig. And if you do have it or had it then show us your 3dmark06 cpu score until then Pro and 1+3+3=7 have the highest cpu scores.
 
Last edited:
my score was 3406. think it should be better?


System Configuration

System and CPU Information
Operating System Microsoft Windows XP
DirectX Version 9.0c
Mobo Manufacturer Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.
Mobo Model GA-K8N Pro-SLI
AGP Rates (Current/Available) 16x / N/A
CPU AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 2213 MHz
Physical / Logical CPUs 1 / 2
MultiCore 2 Processor Cores
HyperThreading Not Available
FSB 200 MHz
Memory 2048 MB

Display Information
Graphics Chipset NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT
Driver Name NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT
Driver Version 9.1.3.1
Driver Status WHQL - FM Approved
Co-operative adapters No
Video Memory 256 MB
Core Clock N/A
Memory Clock N/A

Benchmark Settings
Default Settings Yes
Program Version 3DMark06 Revision 0 Build 2
Resolution 1280x1024
Anti-Aliasing None
Texture Filtering Optimal
Vertex Shader Profile 3_0
Pixel Shader Profile 3_0
Force Full Precision No
Disable Post-processing No
Force Software Vertex Shaders No
Force Software FP Filtering No
Disable HW Shadow Mapping No
Color Mipmaps No
Repeat Count Off
Fixed Framerate Off

Main Test Results
3DMark Score 3406 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score 1377 Marks
SM 3.0 Score 1267 Marks
CPU Score 1649 Marks

Detailed Test Results

Graphics Tests
1 - Return to Proxycon 11.212 FPS
2 - Firefly Forest 11.738 FPS

CPU Tests
CPU1 - Red Valley 0.527 FPS
CPU2 - Red Valley 0.826 FPS

HDR Tests
1 - Canyon Flight (SM 3.0) 11.168 FPS
2 - Deep Freeze (SM 3.0) 14.169 FPS

Feature Tests
Fill Rate - Single Texturing N/A
Fill Rate - Multi Texturing N/A
Pixel Shader N/A
Vertex Shader - Simple N/A
Vertex Shader - Complex N/A
Shader Particles (SM 3.0) N/A
Perlin Noise (SM 3.0) N/A

Batch Size Tests
8 Triangles N/A
32 Triangles N/A
128 Triangles N/A
512 Triangles N/A
2048 Triangles N/A
32768 Triangles N/A
 
Pr0 said:
I can beat that score easly with a better cooler.. At I need is 3.8ghz OC But I dont want to stress the life of my processor. Then Again I can always buy another one if something happens to this one.
Click to expand...

Whats yours running at (temp wise)?
 
omg i say that the fx suks because it does right now.And when a new processor from amd or intel will come out core 2 duo will suk to.But he is arguing that now his is better.And its not.
 
i feel that this score is horrible, idk y its so bad, i didnt think my computer was that shitty sm2.0 score 688, and my cpu score was 714
 
DKdeadly said:
omg i say that the fx suks because it does right now.And when a new processor from amd or intel will come out core 2 duo will suk to.But he is arguing that now his is better.And its not.
Click to expand...

so... only the fastest processor doesnt suck according to you? well, then you processor sucks too, since its not the fastest one aroun either..
i mean, c'mon,.. get the facts straight,. there are more good processors except the one YOU have. Either you can agree with that, or be wrong. its plain and simple.

edit: besides, he didnt say his was better,.. he just said he got the highest score. wich is a significant difference.
 
Archangel said:
so... only the fastest processor doesnt suck according to you? well, then you processor sucks too, since its not the fastest one aroun either..
i mean, c'mon,.. get the facts straight,. there are more good processors except the one YOU have. Either you can agree with that, or be wrong. its plain and simple.

edit: besides, he didnt say his was better,.. he just said he got the highest score. wich is a significant difference.
Click to expand...

Archangel if you really are a female. Do you have skills in games? Like cs 1.6 or cs source for example. That is if you like FPS games. How about Bf2... Oblivion? the sims?:D
 
CS Source Lover said:
Archangel if you really are a female. Do you have skills in games? Like cs 1.6 or cs source for example. That is if you like FPS games. How about Bf2... Oblivion? the sims?:D
Click to expand...


I have the increddible skill to get about the last on the list on about every game :( sure.. sometimes i get lucky and something like CS:S, and i make 3 headshots in a row, but im not much of a good player :o
altough,.. i like flying in BF2. as for oblivion, its quite simple,.. but building up a character is the most fun of it
 
I can take both of you down in cs source!!

Here is a taste of me. this pic was taken with my old rig.
ownage14ognm2.jpg
 
Last edited:
Pr0 said:
I can take both of you down in cs source!!

Here is a taste of me. this pic was taken with my old rig.
ownage14ognm2.jpg
Click to expand...


but then again... that doesnt prove much. all you need to have for such a score is a server without rounds, and just spend a lot of rounds in there.. ;)
i mean.. youre kill/deadth ratio isnt 4/1 even :P but yea.. most likely you'll win from me anyway :o
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top