Post your SuperPi Score!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Decided to break out the I7 860-


superPiI7860485ghz.jpg
 
Yup, just wondering should I leave a sempron at the top of amd or an i7 at the top of intel hmmmm
# Only one result per-person, per-system will be recorded
Click to expand...
Might of known there would be another fun killing rule :(
 
El Gappo said:
Oh wow that's a nice time :rolleyes: But you should of listened and used the correct os ;)
superpii7920.png
Here is my air time :P Hope you enjoyed 1st place.
Click to expand...


Well according to him the I7 isn't affected in performance 32 vs 64 bit.

Nice time, and stop being such a cocky ass. How about a hard drive bench?
 
87dtna said:
Well according to him the I7 isn't affected in performance 32 vs 64 bit.

Nice time, and stop being such a cocky ass. How about a hard drive bench?
Click to expand...

You need better reading comprehension there hombre.

There is a performance hit being in Vista or Windows 7 REGARDLESS OF THE BIT ARCHITECTURE when using an Intel processor. There is not a frequency attainability issue when migrating to and from 32bit to 64bit with an Intel processor.

Once more, frequency attainability has nothing to do with clock per clock performance. Intel's chips clock per clock performance is effected by using xp versus vista/windows 7, and not by it being 32bit or 64bit.

Why are you failing so hard when trying to understand or are you not really trying to understand at all?
 
Last edited:
Again this isn't about 32 vs 64 bit like met has mentioned about 10 times its about the massive performance hit for 7/vista to xp.

Hard drive benching is boring and takes absolutely no skill, just money on ssd's. Suppose I can crack out some i-ram to really embarrass you :p
 
@EL_GAPPO

You using air on that sempron to get that score... nice score btw... I have got into the 15.9s after more tweeking but my psu just does not like it or I think i could push my 965 further.. give you some competition ey.. :D
 
jasonn20 said:
@EL_GAPPO

You using air on that sempron to get that score... nice score btw... I have got into the 15.9s after more tweeking but my psu just does not like it or I think i could push my 965 further.. give you some competition ey.. :D
Click to expand...

Not air no :p That's on phase and really had to push to get under 15.4 :rolleyes: Ive beat the time with a 965 on air before now but I had more fun getting the sempron up there.

Quick run on phase
signature.img
Only id the 1 quick run :( didn't optamize anything atall.

signature.img
Same again but on air.

signature.img
Acctually trying under phase

signature.img
Again not optimized because I was tweaking for wprime.

Quick cpu-z

And a little pifast in between runs ;)
signature.img



Those cas5 timmings were the hardest thing to achieve, especially on a £20 set of value ram lol.
 
Last edited:
2048Megabytes said:
I can see people are still posting there results using the old Super-Pi program. Might I suggest we turn our attention to the following and go to this thread:

http://www.computerforum.com/163868-multi-threaded-super-pi-contest.html

Y-cruncher: Multi-Threaded Pi-Benchmark for Multi-Core Systems.

This program is a lot better at measuring processor performance over the old Super-Pi program.
Click to expand...
The purpose of this is to see how CPU architecture has improved, this way you can compare single, dual, and quad cores together. With that other version you can only compare CPU's of the same number of cores.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top