Would you consider this person to be a fanboy, at all?

BurningSkyline

BurningSkyline

New Member
ay3n2p.png


The person on the top was saying "yes you are a fanboy, considering how bad AMD is compared to intel and nvidia."

Also, I apologize for the overly large photo.
 
Maybe, there is nothing wrong with liking a product, disagree with AMD barley being able to run Minecraft cause those quad cores and six core cpu's they are pretty nice for the price.

But proof of a non fan boy is being able to admit when a product is better then your like we all know current AMD cpu's do not have anything on current Intel cpu's. So does he deny that Intel is better then AMD?
 
DMGrier said:
Maybe, there is nothing wrong with liking a product, disagree with AMD barley being able to run Minecraft cause those quad cores and six core cpu's they are pretty nice for the price.

But proof of a non fan boy is being able to admit when a product is better then your like we all know current AMD cpu's do not have anything on current Intel cpu's. So does he deny that Intel is better then AMD?
Click to expand...

I actually didn't want to post this thread in the first place, but yes he did. If it isn't Nvidia or Intel, its a downgrade.

EDIT: If you see the name Slixor I can pretty much guarantee its that person talking there... He is damn well near cyber stalking the people on our minecraft server because we banned him.
 
Last edited:
now are we talking head to head (like i5quad or i7quad vs Phenom iix4) or just all intel is better? I would beg to differ on all intel is better. Take a Celeron dual and 9800gt vs a Phenom ii x 2 and HD3850. Whats going to run everything better?
 
Yes, intel does make superior products. But saying that an AMD CPU will barely run windows is ridiculous. AMD makes perfectly good products. That being said, I have been Intel all this time, but the bulldozer is on my radar for my new build.
 
I wasnt arguing that intel isnt better. I know it is. My i3-380m will blow away my Phenom II x4 laptop processor any day you ask it to. What I was saying is, it seems from what he is saying in that screen shot is that all intels are better than all AMD's. This is not true. Take a Pentium 3 vs a Sempron 130. whats going to be a faster processor? or a Pentium 4 vs a Phenom II x 4 955. His argument there isnt holding water.
 
intell only really wins around 100 bucks and up, below that in the budget section you know amd has some good stuff there, i'd take an athlon ii x3 over a pentium g620 any day, but i know i'd go i5-2500 over a phenom ii x6 1100t.
 
I think that would be closer than you give it credit for. The g620 is sandybridge. even a dual core, I think it would give an Athlon ii x3 a run for its money.
 
Guy is a fanboy, AMD rigs are just fine especially for budget users and the Phenom II line has shown to be a great overclocker. Intel will provide better results especially when you overclock but you pay more of a premium for what you get.
I always thought the AMD vs Intel vs Nvidia vs ATI was stupid. Each has their own appeal and personally I want neither side to be superior for more than a year or two at a time. Prevents one from destroying the other and helps keep prices down and the tech come out faster.


Intel has shown they will "sit" on chips with no competition around, I imagine AMD would too if they ever had Intel's monopoly years ago.
 
DMGrier said:
Maybe, there is nothing wrong with liking a product, disagree with AMD barley being able to run Minecraft cause those quad cores and six core cpu's they are pretty nice for the price.

But proof of a non fan boy is being able to admit when a product is better then your like we all know current AMD cpu's do not have anything on current Intel cpu's. So does he deny that Intel is better then AMD?
Click to expand...

Indeed. You're absolutely right.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top