Video and dSLR are basically two opposite things. I wouldn't suggest making a decision on an dSLR based on it's video functions or even purchasing such a camera to record video. I will say I'm quite surprised at my Pentax's video capabilities, but it's still rather limited. 720p, 24FPS, M-JPEG (so quite large files), mediocre mono microphone, no autofocus, noisy stabilizer, jumpy exposure... Now I can't say much about other brand's capabilities since I've never really used them, but I think you'd be better off getting a nice SLR for PHOTOS and a cheaper HD camcorder for videos.
[-0MEGA-];1459132 said:Lots of people are buying Canon's cameras solely for video recording, even House has filmed some scenes using a 5D Mark II!
The Canon T2i would be a great starter DSLR, but note that there is no auto focus on video DSLR's, at least not on Canon's. Everything must be focused manually.
Interesting, but I don't think it'd put me off buying a DLSR to shoot video. For the price they're amazing.
What do you mean by "not very good quality"? Canon's HD video feature of their DSLR's are much better then any of their consumer level HD camcorders.Meh, I'm not too fond of the idea of getting an expensive DSLR with not very good video recording quality for a "few biking videos". You'd be better off getting a really nice video recorder that meets all your criteria.
Meh, I'm not too fond of the idea of getting an expensive DSLR with not very good video recording quality for a "few biking videos". You'd be better off getting a really nice video recorder that meets all your criteria.