(RETIRED) Sticky: Official CPU-Z Benchmark Thread

Darren said:
I tried 4.1 and it couldn't even boot into Windows and then kept crashing the BIOS so fast I couldn't change it back. Had to CMOS reset.

Think I'll stick with 4.0 for now. :)
Click to expand...

YESSSSS. My record is safe!

That's awesome that it's pushing out that performance at that clock speed. Surprised that even your 1700 doesn't wanna clock up any more..
 
Well it did better than I expected... Still a lot worse than the average bench. Should be 1150 (s) and 3600(m). That thing is way too old.

EnPAR1J.png
 
MisterEd said:
You said 1700X stock. I have 1700X stock but my Core Speed is lower. What's the difference?
Also, RAM 16GB (2x8GB) 2600 MHz @2133 MHz.
Click to expand...
I think XFR (enabled by default) was kicking in in my tests, giving me 300Mhz above the stock speed. I see it affecting your clock too, you're at 100Mhz above stock speed of 3400Mhz.

New score, 4.1GHz stable, crashed if I tried anything even 25Mhz above that. I don't want to run it at 1.515v all the time though even though XFR kicks it up there sometimes in the default state. Probably going to stick with 4.0GHz and under 1.4v if I can make it work.

2n7m9b5kfdcLgEA1zy9p_yaUEDIolDhOEGOJmKnng7nyntKVoae_DfJWPlURi5pbECH9gqKBft7QS1ly43-DYMC-gPDBYLhO0u0TQYAbbo4o2vlwbN4BFIVbyQK_L6Apu-tndJSCJ_iSMJaWO5B1TjCXsOqB4jZe3czPZfJ5KF3jTO0gdPLgX00jwsLAoje0DzSr9dD2-Zo4TvfNI_UyqBG3Y9HiCpB6nN01DygSXBQWCeWmzVvkhIhrzsmPtgHESx_Pjy9t5WmI7CecbvKvQHCBRGsqbc3NQVnVhyxnLQjRPzerEA5J6R5JSW0LHlq04p9Yy8rEkpNHnr6wfP0SugMUkp5gtESw-U5mpR9BI1RPkLlUj3bglf0Amjui2vYk9i_xRlOI6G7xQEIV2VyE2tkU2EBKek0ff5C_IegVwQ3LXUoGmXt1c31QGrd4h-AwJeI9Ajs0Z5Ao5qo1NyYGGpWlDUUInSPs4mMZ_Rz1im9enSjcNdhocF3Ns1eDbeK4owyy0QnuNPSMmdZZOUEj6fRJ6L4POBlX8foxwOs2jx9YSBmFdebDtyWw5daNcJEhzpOkERrQmPs4F4K_Pjp4SDqPnRPkcJWKgoV21L4k0GDRk75LPeTxWw=w1385-h466-no
 
lucasbytegenius said:
I think XFR (enabled by default) was kicking in in my tests, giving me 300Mhz above the stock speed. I see it affecting your clock too, you're at 100Mhz above stock speed of 3400Mhz....
Click to expand...
1700X specs: Base 3.4GHz, Turbo 3.8GHz, XFR 3.8GHz+. At the default system configuration XFR allows the 1700X will go higher than 3.8GHz if it thinks it can safely do so.

Normally my 1700X bounces between 2195.55 MHz (x22) and 3492.92 MHz (x35). That is because of the "balanced" power setting I am using. Occasionally it will jump up to 3892.11 MHz (x39).

I think your 1700X is clocking a little higher than mine because you have a better cooler. You have a H110i while I only have a H60.
 
MisterEd said:
1700X specs: Base 3.4GHz, Turbo 3.8GHz, XFR 3.8GHz+. At the default system configuration XFR allows the 1700X will go higher than 3.8GHz if it thinks it can safely do so.

Normally my 1700X bounces between 2195.55 MHz (x22) and 3492.92 MHz (x35). That is because of the "balanced" power setting I am using. Occasionally it will jump up to 3892.11 MHz (x39).

I think your 1700X is clocking a little higher than mine because you have a better cooler. You have a H110i while I only have a H60.
Click to expand...

You should definitely be doing better than that. Your scoring lower than me at stock clocks, which just flat isn't right. Are you on a clean install of Windows, basically a requirement for new motherboard and CPU platforms.
 
MisterEd said:
1700X specs: Base 3.4GHz, Turbo 3.8GHz, XFR 3.8GHz+. At the default system configuration XFR allows the 1700X will go higher than 3.8GHz if it thinks it can safely do so.

Normally my 1700X bounces between 2195.55 MHz (x22) and 3492.92 MHz (x35). That is because of the "balanced" power setting I am using. Occasionally it will jump up to 3892.11 MHz (x39).

I think your 1700X is clocking a little higher than mine because you have a better cooler. You have a H110i while I only have a H60.
Click to expand...
Don't use Balanced, use High Performance. Balanced parks your cores.

And yeah I bet my cooler has a small part to play in it :D I had to buy a new case to fit this massive thing, and it barely fits in my new case (S340). that's what she said
 
Darren said:
You should definitely be doing better than that. Your scoring lower than me at stock clocks, which just flat isn't right. Are you on a clean install of Windows, basically a requirement for new motherboard and CPU platforms.
Click to expand...
I installed Windows 10 Pro from a USB flash drive to a SSD drive (NVME M.2). This is my first Windows 10 build.

I experimented with setting the multiplier manually and then letting TPU configure things. Using TPU resulted in a lower clock speed but I got a higher Bench score with CPU-Z. I noticed that my Single Thread score (2393 vs 2367) is similar to yours but my Multi Thread is lower 16180 vs 20427). Also my Multi Thread Ratio is lower ( 7.76 vs 8.63). Do you think your better cooling is making a difference? Your RAM is faster but I would not think that would make a difference with a CPU test.
=======================
Set in BIOS
Custom CPU Core Ratio: Manual
TPU: Keep Current Settings
CPU Core Ratio: 40.0X
CPU Speed: 4000 MHz
-----------------------
CPU-Z CPU
Multiplier: 40X
Core Speed: 3992 MHz
CPU-Z Bench
CPU Single Thread: 2231
CPU Multi Thread: 15244
=======================
Set in BIOS
Custom CPU Core Ratio: Auto
TPU: TPU II
CPU Core Ratio: 38.25X
CPU Speed: 3825 MHz
-----------------------
CPU-Z CPU
Multiplier: 38.25
Core Speed: 3817 MHz
CPU-Z Bench
CPU Single Thread: 2393
CPU Multi Thread: 16180
=======================
 
I have a AMD Ryzen 1700X. After I ran the ran the Bench I selected Submit and Compare. The web browser opened with the results shown. Unfortunately this caused a hard crash on my computer. It took me several minutes to get the computer to boot again. Is the problem caused by CPU-Z being not fully compatible with Ryzen yet?
 
beers said:
Probably from this part:
Click to expand...
Could be but in my case no. It crashed even if I set the Ryzen 1700X to its default speed of of 3.4GHz.
It turned out that my default browser Firefox doesn't like the upload results page for CPU-Z. If I change the default browser to Internet Explorer then I have no problems opening that page with CPU-Z and viewing the results.
 
Now that I have some stable RAM I got up to 3.9GHz at 20K points. Runs exact same voltage and temps from 3.6GHz to 3.9GHz, very odd scaling with these chips. Will update leaderboard within a day or two. 3_9 20K.PNG
 
Darren said:
Now that I have some stable RAM I got up to 3.9GHz at 20K points. Runs exact same voltage and temps from 3.6GHz to 3.9GHz, very odd scaling with these chips. Will update leaderboard within a day or two. View attachment 8130
Click to expand...
I don't know if your 1700 will go any higher than 3.9GHz but my 1700X highest stable speed is 4.0GHz. It hard crashes 4.05GHz.

In your first post you said that "only members with 50 posts or more will be listed in the leaderboard". Does that mean a person has to upload a benchmark result 50 times before they are eligible to be on the leaderboard? If so then that would explain why my results have not shown up. BTW, why haven't any Ryzen results shown up on the CPU-Z leaderboard yet?
 
Last edited:
MisterEd said:
I don't know if your 1700 will go any higher than 3.9GHz but my 1700X highest stable speed is 4.0GHz. It hard crashes 4.05GHz.

In your first post you said that "only members with 50 posts or more will be listed in the leaderboard". Does that mean a person has to upload a benchmark result 50 times before they are eligible to be on the leaderboard? If so then that would explain why my results have not shown up. BTW, why haven't any Ryzen results shown up on the CPU-Z leaderboard yet?
Click to expand...

Darren has to manually update the leaderboards by making a new chart. You have 73 posts aka "Messages" so you are eligible to be posted when he updates it.
 
Ehhh.... ok. I see some of your specs, but you haven't completed the CPU-Z benchmark. You know, what this hole tread is about.

I can see this is your first post. I'll say welcome to the forum. Glad to have you. But how about introducing yourself first.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top