Photo hosting site

[voyagerfan99]

Looking for a good place to host and store my pictures with as little quality decay as possible. Something like Photobucket, Flickr, etc. Which one's best?

 

[Justin]

I use Flickr. The image quality doesn't get affected when uploaded. Plus, it's easier to organize your photos into sets(albums) and you can add them in public groups for others to see.

 

[MBGraphics]

Before I got my SmugMug I always used Flickr, it's great and they have made lots of improvements. I would go with that unless you are ok with paying $60 a year for a Power account with SmugMug

 

[Fatback]

I'm a little late, but I'll chime in anyways.

I like Flickr for the most part. It bugs me that the only allow 200 photos at a time unless you pay for a pro account. Then again, the fact that your photos don't lose quality, and you can add them to groups to get them noticed make up for that. I put everything on my Flickr, but I made a site on Wix(link in sig). Where my best stuff there, and its nice to be able to give people an actual url(well I use a sub domain) if they wanna see my photos.

 

[Punk]

Panoramio.com

If you locate them on google maps, you'll have a chance they'll appear on google Earth.

 

[Geoff]

Before I got my SmugMug I always used Flickr, it's great and they have made lots of improvements. I would go with that unless you are ok with paying $60 a year for a Power account with SmugMug

Another vote for SmugMug, it's a great site!