|Official| Smiles Benchmark 2.0 Ranking Thread! (new version :P)

Virssagòn

Virssagòn

VIP Member
Smiles Benchmark 2.1


By SmileMan and Vistakid10

Version 2.0
Sunday, July 1st 2012

New Features!
- 64-bit ONLY!
- System Information Displayed
- Better support for multi-cores and threads
- new (heavy) calculations and longer lasting benchmark
- Option to save final score as a text file
- short 8threaded bench
- heavy 4threaded bench

-----
Instructions

*PLEASE NOTE THIS IS 64-BIT ONLY!

1. Download the exe from here

2. Extract the files to the folder you want

3. Run Smiles App.exe

4. Press Benchmark

5. Submit your scores!

6. You can save your final result now! (it will be saved in the same folder you extracted the exe file.

----
After you press the Benchmark button, the application may freeze for a few seconds. This is a normal occurance, please leave the application running!
make sure you closed all other processes!

SAVING YOUR SCORE!

- Press the Save button and a text document will appear in the same folder as the Smiles App.exe is located.

Preview (from vistakid):

light.png

heavy.png


Information

The benchmark is messured in ticks, the total result will be calculated to seconds. Lower is better!!

It can take a minute, if you got a really bad pc 2 minutes. Sometimes it freezes, just wait for 2 minutes.
If it don't get back to life, contact me!

This is my first app in the benchmarking section, so there is place for comments on my work!


Known Bugs

- there occurs a minus sometimes, just start the benchmark over again and it will dissapear.
- others... long load time,...

The Results!

Place your own results in a comment! Only x64biy plz
Like this "yourforumname"(cpu, ram, time in seconds)
+ post an image with the result in the app!


*Times are in seconds. Lower is better!

*All CPU clockspeeds are stock unless otherwise stated.

Top 15 Heavy 4-Threaded:

1. Laquer Head - i7 3770K 5.0 - 16G RipJaws-X 1866 - 89.2945568
2. wolfeking - i7 2600K 4.5 - 8G DDR3 - 93.8184
3. tech savvy - i5 2550K 4.2 - 8G Vengeance - 98.4546284
4. vistakid10 - i5 2500K 4.3 - 16G RipJaws-X 1648 - 98.4861003
5. salvage-this - i7 930 4.0 - 12G Dominator 1600 - 106.1212076
6. KasperL - i7 3930K - 16G DDR3 - 109.4273062
7. SmileMan - i7 2600K - 16G Hyper-X 1600 - 111.4573749
8. wolfeking - i7 2600K - 8G DDR3 - 118.0815084
10. Jamebonds1 - i3 540 4.6 - 4G Patriot 1230 - 119.7926104
11. jimkonow - i7 3770S - 16G RipJaws-X - 120.9002124
12. Linkin - i5 2500K - 8G RipJaws-X 1600 - 122.7400203
13. Laquer Head - i7 3610QM - 16G Vengeance 1866 - 129.368
14. jonnyp11 - X4 960T 3.8 (Unlocked to X6) - 8G Kingston 1333 - 151.3961111
15. Hyper-Threaded - X4 855 - 4G RipJaws-X 1333 - 154.7522698


Top 15 Light 8-Threaded:

1. Laquer Head - i7 3770K 5.0 - 16G RipJaws-X 1866 - 16.7232294
2. jimkonow - i7 3770S - 16G RipJaws-X - 18.153434
3. salvage-this - i7 930 4.0 - 12G Dominator 1600 - 18.1645896
4. SmileMan - i7 2600K - 16G Hyper-X 1600 - 18.8240766
5. wolfeking - i7 2600K - 8G DDR3 - 20.3892358
6. Laquer Head - i7 3610QM - 16G Vengeance 1866 - 20.5764361
7. Jamebonds1 - i3 540 4.72 - 4G Patriot 1230 - 20.6700364
8. Claptonman - FX-6100 4.3 - 8G RipJaws-X 1600 - 21.4390775
9. vistakid10 - i5 2500K 4.3 - 16G RipJaws-X 1648 - 27.6008391
10. Hyper-Threaded - X4 855 - 4G RipJaws-X 1333 - 30.1080525
11. tech savvy - i5 2550K 4.2 - 8G Vengeance - 33.9348349
13. FuryRosewood - X4 955 - 16G Crucial 1333 - 34.6200479
14. johnb35 - X4 965 - 8G Vengeance 1600 - 34.8505607
15. vistakid10 - Q8300 - 4G DDR2 667 - 48.701


virusscans:

virustotal



contact me or Vistakid on the forum with a pm!


SmileMan & Vistakid

K guys, here is a snapshot release from the next version 2.2!
Not all the problems are fixed, but thats why we release only a snapshot.

The benchmark will now have 1 Test in case of 2, the passes are built in different ways and different quantities of threads.

Cpu Breaker: 16threaded with 1 very heavy calculation
8-threaded: 8threaded with much easy calculations
4-threaded: 4threaded with 4 big calculations
Xtreme Pass: 32threaded with 1 heavy and 3 other easy calculations (PC crashed when I did 46threaded, so I don't know that it works on dual core cpu's or 1core :P)

The times are measured in seconds.
Your points are Visible in the right corner under in the app. (higher the better)
Under the 4 passes an average from the 4 is shown.

The benchmark last longer and is a bit more stable. The 4threaded is not yet fully fixed, but that doesn't matter much in the points.

You can download the app here:
http://www.2shared.com/file/L07kppJZ/Smiles_App.html

Preview (me):

46097845.png


The scores will be an appart subject in the scoreboard.



SmileMan & Vistakid10
 
Last edited:
K here's mine!!

SmileMan (i7 2600K @ 4.635GHz, 16 Gb 1600MHz Kingston HyperX, 44.8485651)

dsghuhusihgsu.jpg


multithreading! :P
 
Last edited:
bench-1.jpg


Core 2 QUUAAADDD Q8300 @ 2.5GHz (stock), 4GB DDR2 667MHz RAM, 9800 GT, Vista Ultimate SP2 x64.

Quite a big difference between the Q8300 and my oc'd 2500K (see screenshot in first post for my 2500K's score).
 
Last edited:
It finally opened and but froze up. Kept opening it and it finally ran. I have framework 1.1 and 4.0 client profile. I will download 2.0. Here are my results.

benchmark.jpg
 
Yeah I forgot to mention that it will freeze after you press the benchmark button and then it will remain frozen/not responding until the benchmark is complete. I'll add some sort of message box or something warning the user about this sometime soon.

Might be worth getting a later .NET Framework and seeing if the results are any better. Seems odd an X4 965 is slower than a Q8300.
 
The app shows different results for me, sometimes 80 seconds, sometimes 90, sometimes 100.

I suggest working on the freezing issue, the app works but freezes for a minute.
 
Ankur said:
The app shows different results for me, sometimes 80 seconds, sometimes 90, sometimes 100.

I suggest working on the freezing issue, the app works but freezes for a minute.
Click to expand...

It freezes whilst benchmarking and calculating. I've added a warning about this in the newer version which I have sent SmileMan, just gotta wait for him to update the first post with a download link to the version with the warning.

Seems odd it's always different for you. It's always 48.1 seconds for me. Try running with minimal processes and applications running, then see how it goes. :)
 
I just installed net framework 4 and still have the same result 102.98. Seems there is an issue somewhere.
 
We'll have to see if anybody else who has a Phenom II X4 gets the same sort of score. An X4 965 should be faster than a Q8300.
 
Seems to be a issue with AMD processors. Got 93.35. Ran at the same speed as the first one. My score vs. Intels from the first one vs. this one, looks kinda off.
 
Yeah something's definitely up with the AMD chips if you got 93 on an FX-8120 @ 4.5 :/
 
At 4.2 same as the other. This one is only using 4 cores. Noticed everytime I ran it, would use different cores. Dont know if its a windows thing or the program. But saying that, it didnt make any difference in the score
 
StrangleHold said:
Seems to be a issue with AMD processors. Got 93.35. Ran at the same speed as the first one. My score vs. Intels from the first one vs. this one, looks kinda off.
Click to expand...

vistakid10 said:
Yeah something's definitely up with the AMD chips if you got 93 on an FX-8120 @ 4.5 :/
Click to expand...

Probably an issue with optimization in the benchmark for AMD. Of course, they have a reputation for some bad eggs, but not that kind of flop.

Untitled.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top