Just a quick question to see if my assumption is correct or not. I have been taking classes to get an associates .deg. in IT. To put it into perspective college has not exactly given me what I wanted, a little IT and a lot of crap I don't have any use for. How will knowing how the Krebs cycle and neutron transport chain make ATP for Animal cells help me in IT? thats another argument. It started when he kept saying that he would not burn copies of movies because he was a programer for a local electirc company[I doubt this, more like a baby sitter for thier existing programs] and his programming job could be in jepordy if he was caught. The question is this. I was at a get together and there is a family member who went to Vatterot and after getting a cert. went to work for a local electric company, he says writing programs. I doubt this very much and think he is more of a baby sitter for their system but that is not the point. He started to get a bit testy about my comment that I felt that I wanted to go to a vatterot type institution but the credits are not transferable to any college, not accredited. He got upset I guess thinking this was a slam and started in about how degrees don't matter and its only what you know and how even people who have been coding are behind because of how fast the IT world moves [I so bad wanted to ask if this meant that having been out of class for three years meant that he was obsolete?] but I did not want to start an argument. He went into how the world of IT was B&B I think he meant Business to business, and unless you were working with old spaghetti codes that you were obsolete. I thought spaghetti code was any code new or old that was over complicated with too many go to modals. I did not want to correct him as I was not sure, but when people start to throw out a lot of mumbo jumbo it usually means that they are unsure of themselves but want to desperately project the idea of how much they know. Any thoughts would be helpful.