HF10 or HF20

That's what I'm thinking. But the HF10 is *supposed* to have better low light quality. I plan on making some short films with it.
 
The_Other_One said:
I think most CMOS based cameras have fairly poor low light performance. Now personally I was looking into the HF20.
Click to expand...

Were you just pointing out that both are going to be poor in low light? Because they both have CMOS sensors, and in that case I would 100% agree with you. As far as between the two, the resolution on the HF20 has a much better recording resolution, and I'd go with that since it's not all that much more...
 
DCIScouts said:
Were you just pointing out that both are going to be poor in low light?
Click to expand...

Yes, I meant CMOS sensors in general. Almost every CMOS based camera I've used/owned has gotten much more noisy than my CCD based cameras. The HF20 is still a very good camera, still on my wish list, but expect more noise than you'd probably have in some of your older CCD based cameras...

My new Pentax SLR exhibits a fair bit of noise if the conditions are just right, regardless of the ISO. It can be a bit discouraging, but most cameras can manage the noise quite well. That or it's not that noticeable when printed or on a TV...
 
I've had both the HF100 and now the HF20, and the HF20 is best IMO. I heard that it has worse low-light quality, but I've actually found it to be better. It's a great entry level HD camcorder, you won't be disappointed!

I bought mine for $499 at Bestbuy.
 
I went and filmed some boats in the bay earlier this week and the video came out really nice. Definitely a nice camera, but the bit rate is so high for my laptop :P I can hardly play back the video at a decent rate. This one should last a while :D
 
Verve said:
I went and filmed some boats in the bay earlier this week and the video came out really nice. Definitely a nice camera, but the bit rate is so high for my laptop :P I can hardly play back the video at a decent rate. This one should last a while :D
Click to expand...
What program are you using? VLC isn't good for playing the MTS files.
 
[-0MEGA-];1391661 said:
What program are you using? VLC isn't good for playing the MTS files.
Click to expand...

Media Player Classic and Vegas Pro 8.0 for editing. Its a bit choppy in both.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top