Audgiy 4 hmmm.....

cool



I usually wait on new products.. (mostly software) But I love my Audigy 2. And the only glaring difference seems to be the signal to noise radio.
 
Thats a prettey big difference the higer the better but its jsut like the p4s they mad expensive just for tech a lil better the amd
 
kopanowsall said:
... its jsut like the p4s they mad expensive just for tech a lil better the amd
Click to expand...

There are more than a few people who would disagree with that statement.




SNR of audigy 2: 108db; audigy 4: 113db.
 
SFR said:
There are more than a few people who would disagree with that statement.




SNR of audigy 2: 108db; audigy 4: 113db.
Click to expand...

No..... ur wrong the best intel chip has always been better then the best amd chip
 
Thats a prettey big difference the higer the better but its jsut like the p4s they mad expensive just for tech a lil better the amd
Click to expand...
Are you gonna just talk or are you going to provide some documented undisputed proof? (by the way do you want to buy my Ti83 calculator, its mad powerful cuz im selling it at $56658468.99)

SNR of audigy 2: 108db; audigy 4: 113db.
Click to expand...
Yeah I saw that too but do many people have speakers that can punch that? (and isnt that the absolute max SNR? i.e.,on 2.1 setup only?)

No..... ur wrong the best intel chip has always been better then the best amd chip
Click to expand...
1. Quit talking shit. If you're gonna make absolute comments -- make them absolutely right comments. (and before you even think about replying consider the Pentium 4 -1.4GHz and the Thunderbird 1.4GHz and recognize the folly of your argument)
2. NEW TOPIC = NEW THREAD. You've been here long enough to know that.
 
No..... ur wrong the best intel chip has always been better then the best amd chip
Click to expand...
Uhhhh.......no. I like Intel but you can't say the P4 is more advanced than the Athlon64. Intel was about sheer clock speed while AMD went for more calcs per clock. If Intel was more advanced why would an Athlon XP @1.67GHz perform better (although hotter) than a P4A @2.2Ghz

NO.jpg
 
Last edited:
Praetor said:
Are you gonna just talk or are you going to provide some documented undisputed proof? (by the way do you want to buy my Ti83 calculator, its mad powerful cuz im selling it at $56658468.99)
Click to expand...
WOW! I have a Ti89 I guess I can sell it for over $80 million!

Praetor said:
Yeah I saw that too but do many people have speakers that can punch that? (and isnt that the absolute max SNR? i.e.,on 2.1 setup only?)
Click to expand...
computer speakers... I dunno .... my speakers (infinity primus).. probably (but I would probably never hear the difference)
 
Last edited:
probably (but I would probably never hear the difference)
Click to expand...
LOL yeah.. im in the same boat ... i can barely tell mono from surround :P ... as long as its uber loud it doesnt matter heehee
 
I wouldn't say that it's worth it, the only real extra is the remote, the card itself seems to be almost identicle to the Audigy 2. And you can get an RF remote from ATI, an Audigy 2 and the net price will probably be less.

Maybe I'm just dumb but what happened to 3, do we count 1, 2, 4 now?
 
Cromewell said:
yes very good :P but it should be 2+1=3 because that isn't a quantum leap (anyone remember that show? :D) from an audigy 2
Click to expand...

I believe the reason for the jump is that Audigy 2 is twice what 1 was... and Audigy 4 is twice what Audigy 2 was.

(Marketing purposes...)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top